Heart disease is the focus of a tremendous amount of research, and rightfully so — it’s the leading cause of death worldwide.

Over the last year, governments and pseudo-governmental agencies and regulators around the world have coerced corporations and private institutions to mandate or create intense social pressure to facilitate the first direct genetic engineering experiment in human history. Regardless of our opinions on these events, they are happening, and it is fascinating to consider the genetic agent that we have collectively chosen to force the human body to produce.

The various pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have unified behind the genetic engineering of a single protein: the spike protein of coronavirus origin that functions as a vascular toxin. We have targeted the hearts of our children, elders, and peers with this neo-vaccine technology — a brand new type of vaccine that’s never been used before.

This technology is no small feat. We have applied decades of genetic engineering tricks learned from the long practice of genetically engineering our food, which allows our crops to tolerate high amounts of bio-toxic herbicides that are carried in the tissue of the resulting foods and passed on to anyone that eats them. We now use a host of synthetic genomic alterations in these injected agents to ensure the protein toxin is produced in an unregulated fashion in organ systems throughout our body within minutes of injection.

Elements of naturally occurring viruses allow for careful balance between the genomic machinery in human cells and the ubiquitous viral genomics. More than 99% of people exposed to these viruses would remain healthy or return to health after exposure. The critical elements of this balancing act (which have necessarily occured in all multicellular organisms throughout the 3.5 billion years of viral genomics on planet Earth) are intentionally eliminated in these synthetic gene-delivery systems of neo-vaccines. All of the normal regulatory checks-and-balances are bypassed at the molecular level to ensure the vast majority of people injected will overproduce these vascular toxin proteins in organ systems throughout the body for weeks or months rather than the hours or few days that a natural viral protein may be present.

The cardiovascular toxicity of these genetically engineered spike proteins is well established and now widely reported in all countries that have deployed the neo-vaccines.

It’s a spike protein through the heart of humanity. There may be some just poetry to this biologic cliff that we are jumping off of, but if we still have one foot on solid ground, there may be an opportunity to shift our awareness and therefore change our behavior in time to let a new health paradigm begin.

As consumers, governmental agents, scientists, and physicians, we have achieved a startling level of unawareness that could be mistaken as trust in the premise of a chemically co-dependent medical system that goes by the moniker of health care.

Throughout this topic, we will illuminate the science of the heart and its extraordinary biology of resilience and repair that begins the moment the first blood vessels are formed. We will consider the design of a dynamic and flexible vascular system that relies on cholesterol within every cell of that system to achieve the flow state of health. We will consider the ramifications of decades of statin drugs on the flexibility and resilience of our vascular system, and the effects of these drugs on our immune system and the balance of the virome and human genomics. We will also review the vascular receptors that are targeted by the spike proteins of the neo-vaccines to better understand how injury occurs and how we may improve our resilience and recovery in the face of these injuries.

Medicine is filled with many associations that are not causations, like cholesterol and vascular disease

The problem is, humanity is historically slow to change beliefs. We can change cell phones and technologies in the home with blinding speed. But to change a belief, especially if it is scientific or religious in nature, can take years, decades, or in many cases centuries to shift. Despite the appearance of being highly progressive and cutting-edge, much of Western medicine is bogged down in dogma that is decades and centuries old. Once a theory takes hold, it’s hard to extinguish it.

Nothing solidifies a hypothesis as fact more than a Nobel Prize. In 1985, Nobel Award winners Michael Brown and Joseph Goldstein stated ‘The more LDL [cholesterol] there is in the blood, the more rapidly atherosclerosis develops.’ And with that, this correlation was mistaken for causation, and cholesterol became the cause of vascular disease and public enemy number one. And it’s a belief held even today despite evidence and reems of scientific understanding to the contrary.

Heart disease is the focus of a tremendous amount of research, and rightfully so — it’s the leading cause of death worldwide. Through decades of study, scientists have identified multiple genes and environmental conditions that can potentially increase the risk of dying of heart disease. But trying to understand how these risks affect us is complicated.

Predictors of cardiovascular disease

In the traditional theory, the higher your cholesterol, specifically the LDL cholesterol, the greater your risk of developing heart disease. It was originally thought that the excess circulating LDL particles would pass through the cells lining the arteries and become trapped in the wall of the artery. Once stuck, they initiated an inflammatory reaction that caused the arteries to narrow leading to heart attacks and strokes.

If the 1985 cholesterol theory is correct, that LDL cholesterol is causing heart disease, then there should be a demonstrable connection between the blood cholesterol levels and the extent of disease.

In fact, there is no relationship between the level of LDL and the severity of arterial disease. It is well established through numerous studies that there is no relationship between the level of cholesterol and the severity of atherosclerosis detected by autopsy. The level of blood cholesterol also has no relationship to the severity of atherosclerosis detected by angiogram, which is a test where dye is injected into the arteries making them visible on an x-ray.

If cholesterol isn’t causing the arterial disease, then why does a high cholesterol predict cardiovascular disease? It may be because high cholesterol levels could be secondary to other factors in our environments that promote disease in other ways. Lack of physical activity, smoking, obesity, and mental stress; in these situations, high cholesterol may be an epiphenomenal sign that something else is wrong.

What we do know is that individuals with chronic inflammatory diseases have an elevated risk of developing heart disease. We also know that lack of exercise, poor diet, lack of sleep, and stress are associated with chronic systemic inflammation and an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease.

Interestingly, research is showing this to be fact.

We are seeing a similar situation in our current pandemic, where association and causation are being confused. It’s been widely reported that the COVID-19 virus is the cause of the many reported pulmonary complications. However, it is not the virus itself that is leading to destruction of the lung tissue. Damage to the lung is the result of an overactive inflammatory response — the exact mechanism of which is still uncertain. It is interesting to note that the majority of individuals who are encountering complications have other diseases considered to be chronic inflammatory conditions. We can associate the virus with lung complications, but we can’t say it’s causing them.

We have come to a place in our society where science by press conference is the norm. Words such as “might”, “possible”, “could” now equate to certainty. As the headlines are echoed throughout the media, these important qualifier words are left out of our conversations. Vaccines that “might” prevent infections now prevent infections. Now more than ever, it’s important to dive behind the headlines and do your due diligence of what you read and hear.